By Laurie H. Rogers
Those who exert the
first influence upon the mind, have the greatest power.
-- Horace Mann, Thoughts
The writing is on the wall. In a June 7, 2013, statement,
Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said President Obama is planning to
"redesign" America’s high schools. This redesigning will take place
through “competitive grants” (also known as “bait”). Who will pay for this
redesigning? (Taxpayers will, as we always do.) How much will it cost? (The
secretary and president haven’t said, as they rarely do.) Does the president
have the legal or constitutional authority to “redesign” America’s high
schools? (No.)
According to 20 USC 3403, Obama and Duncan also lack the
authority to direct standards, curriculum and teaching approaches. That isn’t
stopping them. They say their interventions are for our own good.
- "Student-centered" learning
- "Project- or-problem-based" learning
- "Real-world experiences” and “real-world challenges"
- "Evidence-based professional development"
- Engaging in “complex projects” and working with others to apply knowledge
- Moving “away from the traditional notion of seat time"
Uh, oh.
Math advocates will recognize that language. It typically alerts us to reform math – to fuzzy content, “discovery learning” (or constructivism), excessive group work, teachers who don’t directly teach, and lofty concepts presented before skills. That approach has not worked well for students for the last three decades.
Math advocates will recognize that language. It typically alerts us to reform math – to fuzzy content, “discovery learning” (or constructivism), excessive group work, teachers who don’t directly teach, and lofty concepts presented before skills. That approach has not worked well for students for the last three decades.
It seems Duncan is a reformer, and why wouldn’t he be?
Public education systems, colleges of education, curriculum developers and
policy makers all have been bathed in reform philosophy and approaches since
the 1980s. The president’s new mandate – excuse me, his new initiative –
appears to mandate an instructional model that has
completely failed children for 30 years.
Duncan and Obama also push the controversial Common Core
initiatives, which are leading many districts to fuzzy math and weak English
programs. The CC math standards contain a separate section, called the
“Standards for Mathematical Practice.” Many states and districts are
emphasizing the SMP, and the SMP supports a constructivist approach. Voila:
more reform math.
It’s noteworthy that the publisher of Singapore Math –
a series long praised by traditionalists – released a new “discovery”
version based on the CC. Other publishers also have done so. They appear to believe
the CC embraces constructivism, and they're going along with it.
And now we have this high-school initiative, announced with
the same language used by proponents of reform math. After three decades of
grim failure, reform approaches to math are unlikely to suddenly work for
students just because the feds throw another trillion taxpayer dollars at them.
In April, Obama also announced plans to “expand” early
learning programs for 4-year-olds, rolling them into the K-12 system.
Initially, children will be from low-income families, but other families and
toddlers are to be rolled in, too. “Preschool for All” is estimated to cost
taxpayers $75 billion over 10 years.
This de facto federal takeover of public education is
cunning and devious. Many Americans have been persuaded that the Common Core
and related initiatives are “state-led” and academically better; that nothing
is federally mandated; that our right to privacy is intact; and that the
Standards are the key.
Not true.
Proponents say the CC initiatives are voluntary;
internationally benchmarked; research-based; rigorous; proved to work; that
they’ll save money; they’ll provide commonality and consistency; and that they
aren’t “one-size-fits-all.”
Not true.
The CC initiatives were never internationally benchmarked or academically sufficient. They aren’t grounded in
scientifically conducted, replicable research. They’re unproved, with no
student data behind them. They’re a national experiment on children. They won’t
save taxpayers money. A base cost estimate just to get started is $140
billion nationwide (14,000 school districts x $10 million each).
The CC initiatives are voluntary only in a technical sense.
States and districts have been threatened with the loss of federal funds, with the loss of money for impoverished students, and
(ironically) with punishments under the No Child Left Behind Act if
they don’t comply.
The CC initiatives also include an intrusive national database on children and their parents and guardians. Data and information are to be collected and shipped around public agencies, corporations and organizations without our knowledge or consent. Certain state and federal laws were altered or ignored in order to allow and facilitate this sharing of private information. Citizens were not informed.
The
birds did not understand Snowball’s long words, but they accepted his
explanation, and all the humbler animals set to work to learn the new maxim by
heart. (Animal Farm)
How long will it be before the feds threaten the loss of
taxpayer dollars if states don’t comply with the new high school “grant”
initiative or the new early learning initiative? How long before states and
districts shrug off questions from parents and taxpayers, saying they had no
choice in these matters?Considering the unproved and dictatorial nature of these federal initiatives, they can’t be about academics. I expect the feds will find it necessary to redesign middle schools to “align” with redesigned high schools. Elementary schools will have to “align” with redesigned middle schools. Preschools will have to “align” with redesigned elementary schools. Colleges are already aligning. It will be one brick at a time, each ripped from the fabric and foundation of the country. This is about control.
With this incredible taxpayer expense – and with academic programs that continue to be as weak as a White House explanation – the children and the country will sink into economic and academic dust. Education policy makers have learned nothing over three decades. Or, perhaps they’ve learned everything. Choose your poison. No doubt, Obama and Duncan will report great improvements.
- Help your child. Fill in academic gaps. Leave the public system if it isn’t working for your child.
- Support Alabama Representative Martha Roby’s effort to rein in the U.S. Department of Education. Ask your representatives to support H.R.5 (the Student Success Act 2013), introduced in Congress on June 6, 2013. This bill won’t undo everything, but it’s a step in the right direction.
- Say no to the intrusive data collection that comes with a district’s participation in the CC. Don’t tell them anything about your family that you don’t want Bill Gates, Pearson Education, the ED, the IRS, the Department of Justice, and other government agencies to know. Refuse questionnaires and surveys. Don’t tell them your voting status, political preference or religion.
“In a world of locked rooms, the man with the key is
king...” (BBC series Sherlock). Don’t let them have the key.
Rogers, L. (June 2013). "Children are the key to America's future. The government wants control of that key." Retrieved (date) from the Betrayed Web site: http://betrayed-whyeducationisfailing.blogspot.com
4 comments:
It's been going on much longer than 30 years. See this fascinating research on constructivist/reform math in the US.
http://www.csun.edu/~vcmth00m/AHistory.html
The high school redesign will "encourage" districts to transform the high school experience for all stakeholders, right down to the local level. The conflict with 20 USC 3403 and this approach is illuminated, like shinning a flashlight into the dark corners where the cockroaches live.
Our Education Establishment has no shame. I hope everyone will fight this at every turn.
(The main thing is that you could go to a K-12 school that does all these fancy gimmicks and at the end you could be quite uneducated. With luck, you might have what used to be called an eighth-grade education. In fact, I believe that is the actual goal.)
Public education is not really an issue. One of the hot topics in education is the fact that the government is not really putting a lot of attention to this. I'm seeing the government trying to improve the economy without even thinking about schools and education.
Post a Comment